“That means tech companies that are subject to proper democratic control, countries where free trade and movement can be both embraced or curtailed, and an overall framework that makes those choices possible, so that people don’t feel they have to overturn the whole of society to have their voices heard.”
“That means tech companies that are subject to proper democratic control, countries where free trade and movement can be both embraced or curtailed, and an overall framework that makes those choices possible, so that people don’t feel they have to overturn the whole of society to have their voices heard.”
What are the details exactly of “proper democratic control” of tech companies? And why would that matter? Is the “democratic control” of private tech companies actually proper? A democracy can make really awful choices that are antithetical to other ideals of justice. Majorities are not wise by default.
In an age that is obsessed with ‘minorities” it’s a bit uncanny to simultaneously witness the worship of “democracy.”
If we take what many Democrats and Republicans are asking for, the proper control of tech behemoths involves allowing or even forcing them to restrict some voices because it is deemed “misinformation”.
What does the author think about that? Unfortunately I feel like that kind of mystery and lack of clarity runs through this whole piece. Except that he thinks Trump and Brexit ushered a collapse of his dreams of global domination. That was pretty clear. It seems that is now a standard practice among many authors--to symbolically demonstrate some opaque political allegiance by blaming Trump for the world’s problems.
“That means tech companies that are subject to proper democratic control, countries where free trade and movement can be both embraced or curtailed, and an overall framework that makes those choices possible, so that people don’t feel they have to overturn the whole of society to have their voices heard.”
What are the details exactly of “proper democratic control” of tech companies? And why would that matter? Is the “democratic control” of private tech companies actually proper? A democracy can make really awful choices that are antithetical to other ideals of justice. Majorities are not wise by default.
In an age that is obsessed with ‘minorities” it’s a bit uncanny to simultaneously witness the worship of “democracy.”
If we take what many Democrats and Republicans are asking for, the proper control of tech behemoths involves allowing or even forcing them to restrict some voices because it is deemed “misinformation”.
What does the author think about that? Unfortunately I feel like that kind of mystery and lack of clarity runs through this whole piece. Except that he thinks Trump and Brexit ushered a collapse of his dreams of global domination. That was pretty clear. It seems that is now a standard practice among many authors--to symbolically demonstrate some opaque political allegiance by blaming Trump for the world’s problems.