I think the questions raised here are all valid. I would add that we face them with every government action or rule or law that isn't "universal". I've often heard "place-based" programs proposed as a solution (or at least an approach) to the US's 'hinterland' problem. But how could such programs avoid being wide open channels for corruption and political favoritism? The only defense against it (or, put another way, the precondition to creating/restoring a credible and respected administrative state) would be a political culture that absolutely demanded fair dealing and rules-based decision-making. We are far, today, from having one.
I think the questions raised here are all valid. I would add that we face them with every government action or rule or law that isn't "universal". I've often heard "place-based" programs proposed as a solution (or at least an approach) to the US's 'hinterland' problem. But how could such programs avoid being wide open channels for corruption and political favoritism? The only defense against it (or, put another way, the precondition to creating/restoring a credible and respected administrative state) would be a political culture that absolutely demanded fair dealing and rules-based decision-making. We are far, today, from having one.
I wish this were outside your paywall. It needs to be widely shared.
It is! Most of our articles are. Only paid subscribers can comment, but everyone can read this