Missing the dripping irony here. Twittergate proves that the media has been putting thousands of thumbs on the political scale for Democrats. There has been more election denial from Democrats since AL Gore lost. The Jim Crow cry about Georgia is an example. Yes, Republican election deniers got slammed, but that result confirms their…
Missing the dripping irony here. Twittergate proves that the media has been putting thousands of thumbs on the political scale for Democrats. There has been more election denial from Democrats since AL Gore lost. The Jim Crow cry about Georgia is an example. Yes, Republican election deniers got slammed, but that result confirms their claims are valid. For Republicans to elect Democrats to the Senate given what the Democrats are doing and what is at stake... clearly they were influenced to vote against their own principles by the repeat of their media feeds.
Your belief is that R's can't withstand the bias in the media (people self select the media they want) and therefore were swung into voting for democrats? Do these people have no agency?
Seems like a disingenuous argument. Your argument is 1. whataboutism and 2. It's unlikely to be causal.
Pile up all the reasons people chose Ds over Rs in your mind. Give them all %s as to what was the most important. What % is the "media bias" cause? Then tell me your pie.
I reckon it was the independents that were swung by media bias and censorship, Trump hate and abortion. Voters who do not dig in beyond the talking points have little idea of what is really going on. If the talking point is a lie, ie Jim Crowe 2.0, they might be influenced.
Missing the dripping irony here. Twittergate proves that the media has been putting thousands of thumbs on the political scale for Democrats. There has been more election denial from Democrats since AL Gore lost. The Jim Crow cry about Georgia is an example. Yes, Republican election deniers got slammed, but that result confirms their claims are valid. For Republicans to elect Democrats to the Senate given what the Democrats are doing and what is at stake... clearly they were influenced to vote against their own principles by the repeat of their media feeds.
Your belief is that R's can't withstand the bias in the media (people self select the media they want) and therefore were swung into voting for democrats? Do these people have no agency?
Seems like a disingenuous argument. Your argument is 1. whataboutism and 2. It's unlikely to be causal.
Pile up all the reasons people chose Ds over Rs in your mind. Give them all %s as to what was the most important. What % is the "media bias" cause? Then tell me your pie.
I reckon it was the independents that were swung by media bias and censorship, Trump hate and abortion. Voters who do not dig in beyond the talking points have little idea of what is really going on. If the talking point is a lie, ie Jim Crowe 2.0, they might be influenced.