Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Someone's avatar

Oh Shakespeare redoux: First eliminate free speech and there will be no lying, then kill all the lawyers and there will be no law suits, murder the doctors and none will be sick, then jail the psychologists and there will be no mental illness, and finally defund the police and there will be no more arrests. There are dangers of free speech, but ignorance, dogma and stupidity are, by far, more dangerous. Liberal Democracies can manage Parler, Twitter and Gab. They cannot survive the stubborn cowardice of enforced newspeak.

Expand full comment
Andrew Wurzer's avatar

"The power to police speech historically, and in our own time, tends to be unbalanced and used to suppress the views of the dissenters, the marginalized, those out of power, and to reinforce the prerogatives of those who have the greatest control."

later...

"A lot of what can manifest itself in censorious impulses among young people is born of a noble instinct, which is to protect people from harm, to drive forward a more equal, inclusive society."

And many of those in power who use or have used power over speech to control their politics and culture believe they are doing so for noble and important reasons. That the reasons behind the arguments for censorship are noble (or appear noble to many) is no more relevant for young people than it is for old oligarchs.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts