Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kate Schlesinger's avatar

This important point reaches far beyond your own experience. Unless we think that college admission should be by lottery (which is a different issue), colleges need some information to base their decisions on. I'm a high school teacher, and I'm not sure people appreciate how little grades mean. What earns a student an A in a given course can range widely from teacher to teacher within a school, never mind between schools. Some schools allow anyone who wants to to take honors and AP classes, while other schools guard the gates to those courses. The transcripts, therefore, do not tell colleges much. Extracurriculars, essays, and recommendations are much easier for wealthy families to game than the SATs. Yes, a tutor may help a student a bit, but if the Lori Loughlin example shows us anything, it's that all the money in the world can't necessarily help a student earn the score they want without outright cheating. Standardized tests were designed to even the playing field, and, imperfect though they are, they are still the best tool we have to truly distinguish students from each other.

Expand full comment
Someone's avatar

This is a great article. I have been a college professor for 40 years. I grew up in a world of violence, drugs and police. As Joe Namath said, I thought my dad was friends with the police they were over so much. I never expected to go to college and figured I would live the criminal life of my father. But the SATs changed that. I did not do great, but I got into a college with them, and I had some pretty terrible grades and no extracurriculars except smoking weed behind the gym, and one juvenile probation. I ultimately discovered Philosophy and eventually got a PhD at a top University. The liberal arts, which the somnambulant woke want to cancel, and the SAT's that the virtue-signalling universities want to eliminate saved my life, no hyperbole there either.

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts