31 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Craig Knoche's avatar

I understood his point. Mine is that the "will of the people" does not always prevail. By your reasoning

(a) law = what the legislature passes (and Pres. approves),

(b) what the legislature passes = the will of the people, and

(c) the supreme court should never overturn the will of the people

Then there would be no purpose for the supreme court - as by definition all law is legitimate. What matters is not whether a law = "will-of-the-people", rather what matters is whether the law is constitutional.

Expand full comment
The Scarlette Tarte's avatar

I understand. But my broader point is that they justices contort themselves to find things "unconstitutional" just because they don't like the politics of the party that passed the legislation.

Obamacare was, and is, constitutional. But so many right wing judges tried their hardest to find it "unconstitutional". They also tried it to undo social security and medicare the same way.

That is what is wrong.

Expand full comment