Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Ghost of Tariq Aziz's avatar

I'm going to disagree with you on this. The problem isn't that present day journalists are too elitist, it's that they're not elitist enough. Very few of them have any understanding of basic statistics, and this is the language of the social sciences. There is no way to understand the evidence around any key social issue today (racism, sexism, the state of the economy, inequality) without a firm knowledge of statistics. It's a little like trying to write a book review without knowing how to read. Of course they substitute this gap with dogma. What else do they have?

A true understanding of statistics would entail much more intellectual humility, because anybody who has done research in social sciences knows that it is really really hard to prove anything. Most results do not replicate and many fancy statistical techniques turn out to be flawed. What we're left with is a vanishingly small amount of things in which we have confidence, and then a massive sea of uncertainty.

Expand full comment
Ralph J Hodosh's avatar

It was not that long ago that a journalist would stumble over a disconcerting truth, investigate in depth and then write about the adventure. Now, however, journalists who stumble over a disconcerting truth get up, dust themselves off and proceed as if nothing had happened.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts