Right, well... because "climate change" isn't at all about saving the world from the weather. It is a construct from the WEF Great Reset project to defeat western industrial power so the CCP-backed globalist corporatist collectivist uniparty can gain more power and control of the world. Nuclear power is in fact the only sensible green…
Right, well... because "climate change" isn't at all about saving the world from the weather. It is a construct from the WEF Great Reset project to defeat western industrial power so the CCP-backed globalist corporatist collectivist uniparty can gain more power and control of the world. Nuclear power is in fact the only sensible green alternative and with it in abundance there would be affordable electric energy for all... and the use of fossil fuel for remote and portable energy would become acceptable again as we eliminate the burning of fossil fuel for electrical generation.
Can you explain why going for nuclear power would rob this WEF Great Reset project of its power? I'm pretty sure the CCP is building more nukes than anywhere else.
I think a couple of reasons. One - nuclear is a big science and big money option that requires a lot of government support and assistance... it is currently more of a closed industry... one there there are not quick and immediate returns on investment. So, Wall Street is not to interested in it and thus the billionaire boys club is not too interested in it. Neither is the CCP as much of nuclear power science and advancement is dominated by the west. Contrast that to the moves to make fossil fuel scarce so it then requires consumers to switch to wind, batteries and solar... stuff that will sell like hotcakes if the world is forced to use them. Then there is the problem with economic independence from affordable energy. The globalists don't want the competition from small business and upstarts. If electrical power is generated by clean nuclear power, it will end up cheaper than if with wind and solar (over time.... especially with the new reactor designs on the table)... and then fossil fuel will also be cheaper because it is not being used to power electric power generation... and the de minimis carbon emissions from the remaining fossil fuel use will be such that there is not longer the valid argument for it causing climate change. This is all about control of markets... new markets where the billionaires and Wall Street can position themselves in front.
Right, well... because "climate change" isn't at all about saving the world from the weather. It is a construct from the WEF Great Reset project to defeat western industrial power so the CCP-backed globalist corporatist collectivist uniparty can gain more power and control of the world. Nuclear power is in fact the only sensible green alternative and with it in abundance there would be affordable electric energy for all... and the use of fossil fuel for remote and portable energy would become acceptable again as we eliminate the burning of fossil fuel for electrical generation.
Can you explain why going for nuclear power would rob this WEF Great Reset project of its power? I'm pretty sure the CCP is building more nukes than anywhere else.
I think a couple of reasons. One - nuclear is a big science and big money option that requires a lot of government support and assistance... it is currently more of a closed industry... one there there are not quick and immediate returns on investment. So, Wall Street is not to interested in it and thus the billionaire boys club is not too interested in it. Neither is the CCP as much of nuclear power science and advancement is dominated by the west. Contrast that to the moves to make fossil fuel scarce so it then requires consumers to switch to wind, batteries and solar... stuff that will sell like hotcakes if the world is forced to use them. Then there is the problem with economic independence from affordable energy. The globalists don't want the competition from small business and upstarts. If electrical power is generated by clean nuclear power, it will end up cheaper than if with wind and solar (over time.... especially with the new reactor designs on the table)... and then fossil fuel will also be cheaper because it is not being used to power electric power generation... and the de minimis carbon emissions from the remaining fossil fuel use will be such that there is not longer the valid argument for it causing climate change. This is all about control of markets... new markets where the billionaires and Wall Street can position themselves in front.