Every African ruler doesn't do this and normalising authoritarian repression is a bad idea. Economic performance does not justify being a Dictator. If his performance is so good, why does he need to suppress criticism?
Every African ruler doesn't do this and normalising authoritarian repression is a bad idea. Economic performance does not justify being a Dictator. If his performance is so good, why does he need to suppress criticism?
Nearly all of them do. That is an unfortunate reality but it *is* the reality. It is fully normalized in Africa and needs no further normalizing from us. What Kagame accomplished goes far beyond "economic performance." Criticize him for it, fine, but he is singled out far more often than his far worse peers.
Every African ruler doesn't do this and normalising authoritarian repression is a bad idea. Economic performance does not justify being a Dictator. If his performance is so good, why does he need to suppress criticism?
Nearly all of them do. That is an unfortunate reality but it *is* the reality. It is fully normalized in Africa and needs no further normalizing from us. What Kagame accomplished goes far beyond "economic performance." Criticize him for it, fine, but he is singled out far more often than his far worse peers.