Discussion about this post

User's avatar
C. A. Meyer's avatar

tI don't understand why the Global Health experts even need to say "the field worked to aid the advancement of colonialism and empire." So did the railroad system in India, but India would have been nuts to dismantle that system when it won independence instead of building on what was there. Even China under Mao wasn't defensive about saving the beautiful wharfs (like the Bund in Shanghai) and cultural artifacts (temples, the Great Wall, etc) by colonizers or hated feudal warlords. The Chinese recognized these cultural stand-outs wouldn't be there today without the hard labor of the Chinese underclasses. They built on their troubled past. I don't believe the people who play 'lived experience' against scientific discoveries are 'well--intentioned'. Many discoveries in science, art or manufacturing happened under regimes that the narrow-minded would hate. Don't not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Build on the past and weed out inequality instead of assuming colonialism is somehow baked into everything modern.

Expand full comment
PSW's avatar

First of all, with the globalization of travel, there are very good reasons to ensure the health and safety of travelers/traders/business people to other countries, and to do that, it makes sense to extend those concerns to the citizens of those countries, and assist them with those health issues.

Continuing to delegate people into "oppressed" vs "oppressor" categories will only serve to generate ill feelings and hatred between those groups. It is one thing to act as a colonizer to exploit or enslave the local populace, it is quite another to offer help and solutions to serious problems in those populations.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts