Discussion about this post

User's avatar
jt's avatar

I use “M.” like the French do, for Monsieur but ALSO for Mesdames and Mademoiselle EQUALLY. ALL CAPS are ITALICS. :)

TY (thank You) for Your FINE article, M. Buruma.

I THOUGHT Your name was familiar and, yah, I recently read an article on Your end at The New York Review of Books. WHen I read it, I thought You were railroaded.

Your composure in writing this article is remarkable, yet contains what-I-consider to be, factual errors.

"The history of slavery and its long-term consequences still haunt American society and should certainly not be ignored, let alone dismissed as a reason for lingering iniquities."

I recommend that You read the views of someone who knows what they're talking about. A Black conservative, who's not afraid to tell the Truth: "Black Victim To Black Victor: Identifying the ideologies, behavioral patterns and cultural norms that encourage a victimhood complex" https://smile.amazon.com/Black-Victim-Victor-Identifying-ideologies/dp/B0915JT4XD/ref=sr_1_1

The history of slavery and apartheid of Jim Crow is ignonomy for America. But it ended 50 years ago. The effects today? Whatever people wanna pretend it is. The vast MAJORITY of these pretenders are VERY affluent Blacks who live very comfortable lives and most certainly haven't suffered any long-term consequences of slavery. They don’t want You to point out their hypocrisy, of course. As the book says, there's no benefit to pretending, except a lotta these people make a pretty good living from doing so.

"Partly under the influence of Black Lives Matter in the US, this is beginning to change, and high time."

Yeah, some SMALL adjustments need to be made in teaching history. But I'm sure You mean the 1619 Project, rather than BLM. Most scholars view the 1619 Project as, in my words, Historical Fiction. M. Hannah-Jones herself "said," in a presumably deleted tweet, that the Project was an "origin story," not history. So why is it being taught in schools?

"What is needed to oppose the intolerant right is a more tolerant left, open to different views and reasonable argument. Otherwise, there won’t be very much left to defend."

Increasingly, there's nothing left to defend. Who wants to raise a voice in opposition if it can cost You Your job? When parents go to discuss the harm CRT does to their kids... Well, just to raise a question calls out for the words, "Where do they work?"

And I think it goes right back to what You "said" in the article. The BLM-1619 Project-CRT MACHINE is a religious faith with the morals of an abnormally large percentage of Catholic so-called Priests. And one-a the fundamental tenets of The CRT MACHINE is that facts and reason and objectivity are aspects of white supremacy. I think the acolytes of this religion know, at least subconsciously, that their whole way of life is based on IR-rational, IL-liberal ideology, right? All the more viciously they hafta defend it.

Expand full comment
Michael Berkowitz's avatar

Nice essay, but I don't see what good can come of it. Do you think that left-wing thought police are going to say "Huh! I hadn't realized I was motivated by religious zeal. Since I'm an atheist, I'll stop now."? Even suggesting that they show more tolerance than their arch-enemies is unlikely to sway anyone, since the inferiority of the other side is -- as you note in the essay -- so obvious.

Instead, if these phenomena are to be reduced, people will have to get over certain ideas. One of those ideas is that voicing terrible opinions is harmful, because otherwise how could they 𝐧𝐨𝐭 do whatever it takes to silence the clear-and-present-danger?

Another is that what other people think is their affair. So what if a guy doesn't think that structural racism is the cause of X? So what if he doesn't think structural racism exists? So what if he's a racist? Only the most extreme situations -- like the Jim Crow South -- can excuse our involvement in the private lives of our fellow citizens. If you think some stranger needs to lose his position because he has objectionable opinions, you've either set that bar way too low or you have no sense of proportion.

(As an aside, I find it interesting that you write "After all, structural racism does exist in the US," and three sentences later refer to that same idea as "dogma".)

There are other pernicious ideas, but I anyway don't know if it's possible to change people's minds on these things, much less to break their addiction to being mean and patting themselves on the back for it.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts