Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Moderately Well Informed's avatar

Characterizing this dispute as one over “voting rights” is a coup for the partisans pushing HR1. This isn’t about voting rights, it’s about voting convenience. The partisans adopt the term “voting rights” because it has positive moral resonance going back to the fight over the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The controversial state laws in Georgia and other states don’t deprive anyone of the right to vote. They arguably make it less convenient than the emergency voting rules passed during the pandemic, but that is a far cry from denying people the franchise. That is and ought to be the matter of the debate – should the federal government mandate certain levels of voting convenience? My opinion is no: matters of voting convenience ought to be debated and decided at the state level, not the national level.

Expand full comment
Les Vitailles's avatar

"measures including criminalizing providing food or water to those waiting in line to vote"

This canard from the liberal left refers to Georgia's prohibition of providing food or water only to those *** within 150 feet *** of the polling booth, not to those farther away, This simple provision prevents, for example, loads of BLM volunteers, each holding a water bottle, from intimidating voters filling out their ballot.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/mar/29/josh-holmes/facts-about-georgias-ban-food-water-giveaways-vote/

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts