"the “state action” doctrine" is why authoritarians want the government to take over full industries like Health Care.
I think if the Justices vote to allow the social media tech companies to keep censoring, banning, etc. they are no longer qualified for Section 230 protections. They will be in fact seen as publishers and not platforms.
"the “state action” doctrine" is why authoritarians want the government to take over full industries like Health Care.
I think if the Justices vote to allow the social media tech companies to keep censoring, banning, etc. they are no longer qualified for Section 230 protections. They will be in fact seen as publishers and not platforms.
Pick one, but you don't get both.
Yes, to many people want "the government to do something" instead of for example creating decentralised social media