Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sam's avatar

Among the stances of the progressive activist left, I am most sympathetic to the one on climate change (and I shared that stance myself for a time). But there are few issues that require pragmatic, data-driven policy and global, market-driven solutions more than this one; there is no other issue where moralizing, virtue-signalling, and symbolic gestures are more futile.

Expand full comment
Richard Harrington's avatar

We have a perfect example of these dysfunctional strategies in Washington state. Cliff Mass has a good description here: https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2018/10/initiative-i-1631-at-odds-with.html.

The quick summary is that two successive initiatives failed - the first because it wasn't extreme enough for the purists, and the second because it was too extreme and tried to appease the woke requirements (increase revenue by carbon taxes and appoint special interests to decide where the money should go).

What we really need is some functional governance where multiple factions can come together, figure out a reasonable approach that crosses the aisle, and pass some legislation that moves us forward.

I really like Bjorn Lomborg's Copenhagen Consensus - let's focus on interventions that have the best cost-benefit analysis!

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts