“degrade public respect for the legal process”—the current administration already did this. This article is just another reminder of projection reflexes of the left. Interestingly, how we are told we can’t believe or trust what Trump says unless it serves the lefts narrative. I’m not a Trump fan but this article just fuels his followers …
“degrade public respect for the legal process”—the current administration already did this. This article is just another reminder of projection reflexes of the left. Interestingly, how we are told we can’t believe or trust what Trump says unless it serves the lefts narrative. I’m not a Trump fan but this article just fuels his followers and I can understand why. Please stop doing articles like this. You are not helping.
I don't know how one arrives at the conclusion that one can believe what Trump says. Of course, I typically don't believe what Harris says, either, but Trump is head-and-shoulders above just about everyone when it comes to lies and bullshit.
I do agree that the article wouldn't be very persuasive to Trump Republicans. To do so, it really needs to contend with at a minimum the NY prosecution of Trump, which seems to me was a pretty baldly political prosecution.
Ah, I see what you were saying. Yes, my reaction to the "should we believe him? Yes," line was how can you believe him? He'd implied he would jail or possibly even use violence against journalists during prior presidential runs. He says crazy shit all the time. I'm not happy that he says these crazy things, and we should be on our guard, but when you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras.
“degrade public respect for the legal process”—the current administration already did this. This article is just another reminder of projection reflexes of the left. Interestingly, how we are told we can’t believe or trust what Trump says unless it serves the lefts narrative. I’m not a Trump fan but this article just fuels his followers and I can understand why. Please stop doing articles like this. You are not helping.
I don't know how one arrives at the conclusion that one can believe what Trump says. Of course, I typically don't believe what Harris says, either, but Trump is head-and-shoulders above just about everyone when it comes to lies and bullshit.
I do agree that the article wouldn't be very persuasive to Trump Republicans. To do so, it really needs to contend with at a minimum the NY prosecution of Trump, which seems to me was a pretty baldly political prosecution.
“I don't know how one arrives at the conclusion that one can believe what Trump says.”
I didn’t come to the conclusion the author did: “As he promises retribution against his enemies through the courts, should we believe him?
Yes.”
Ah, I see what you were saying. Yes, my reaction to the "should we believe him? Yes," line was how can you believe him? He'd implied he would jail or possibly even use violence against journalists during prior presidential runs. He says crazy shit all the time. I'm not happy that he says these crazy things, and we should be on our guard, but when you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras.