Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Diana Senechal's avatar

I appreciate and admire this approach: two persuasive articles from somewhat opposing perspectives, written by the same author (who genuinely sees both sides).

Generations overlap. The distinctions between Boomers and X-ers, for instance, are not always clear. I am technically (just barely) a Boomer, if 1964 is still a Boomer birth year. But I feel more part of Gen X, to the extent that I feel part of any generic generation. So the question arises: what good do these generation-names do?

I am not convinced that they do much. The divisions are largely arbitrary--and often serve to pit people artificially against each other. My beef with "OK Boomer" or any generation-naming slur, whether directed toward the older or the younger, is that it writes off the person standing before us, who may have a complex combination of views and attributes.

Expand full comment
Michael Berkowitz's avatar

You sound like a nice young man and you write very well, but no, it's not right to "point out flaws in [y]our elders’ worldview" -- at least not to their faces -- and not only because there's actually a point to respecting one's elders. You point out the flaws of illiberalism in terms of power, but the progressive obsession with power is just that -- an obsession. The more immediate problem is that it makes people angry, unfriendly, unself-critical and generally unhappy. We can probably agree, boomers and zoomers alike, that mitigating those effects is what power is supposed to be *for* in the first place.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts