Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Wurzer's avatar

I like how this piece separates the problem of should racism be redefined at all from the more substantive problems caused by the the specific definition Kendi has chosen. I think that's an important distinction and we're better off focusing on that rather than focusing on the fact that Kendi deliberately chose a word that is highly prejudicial (though I myself find it difficult to do so; it galls me that Kendi is -- deliberately, in my opinion -- using the power of the word racism to coerce others into supporting racial egalitarianism through shame and ostracism).

Expand full comment
peace warrior's avatar

I like the emphasis on inequalities rather than on this undefinable 'micro-aggressions' which seem to be able to include anything at all according to the victim. At least we can name and work with inequalities.

I also am excited that there is a real chance to really make some needed changes by looking at issues such as clean water, clean air, climate change and how they disproportionately affect communities of color.

Is is fashionable right now to blame the schools and the teachers when the real issues surrounding academic disparities cannot be addressed when we ignore that children of color are disproportionately drinking tap water with lead, eating foods that have damaging chemicals and immigrating from areas where climate change has led to malnutrition and other health issues.

It is antiracist to care about the causes of continued racial inequities.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts