Like David O, I think the key phrase in this essay is: "unless we are witnessing mass psychosis, most Republicans will move on." Since the 2016 presidential campaign, I've thought the most trenchant analyses of the Trump phenomenon were being produced by a set of people I would've disagreed with more often than not before 2016: Never Tru…
Like David O, I think the key phrase in this essay is: "unless we are witnessing mass psychosis, most Republicans will move on." Since the 2016 presidential campaign, I've thought the most trenchant analyses of the Trump phenomenon were being produced by a set of people I would've disagreed with more often than not before 2016: Never Trumpers. In part, that's because they have an inside track to working in the Republican Party and/or the conservative movement, so they aren't just repeating the predictable critiques of the left. But it's also because many of them grapple with their role in either laying the foundation for some aspect of our current circumstances or failing to see the warning signs that made many of us Never Republicans.
As I read Linda Chavez here, she is somewhat optimistic about the prospect for Republicans moving on from a nationalist, populist, racist, lawless, authoritarian Trump cult of personality and reconstructing a normal conservative party. Like those in the more somber, pessimistic corner of Never Trumpism, I fear that's unlikely. We don't need "psychosis" as an explanation for why we shouldn't place our bets on that outcome. Just understanding what comes of activating all the fear and pleasure centers Trump and his crew have activated should keep us up at night (note: as I write this, I'm up at night). For the record, like Yascha Mounk, I also identify as left-of center but am more willing to identify with the center than ever before. At this point, I view the evacuation of the center of US politics with alarm, fear the effects of the deliberate destruction of vital institutions, and would be thrilled to see the construction of a healthy conservative movement with which I could disagree without fear of anyone being drawn and quartered.
Like David O, I think the key phrase in this essay is: "unless we are witnessing mass psychosis, most Republicans will move on." Since the 2016 presidential campaign, I've thought the most trenchant analyses of the Trump phenomenon were being produced by a set of people I would've disagreed with more often than not before 2016: Never Trumpers. In part, that's because they have an inside track to working in the Republican Party and/or the conservative movement, so they aren't just repeating the predictable critiques of the left. But it's also because many of them grapple with their role in either laying the foundation for some aspect of our current circumstances or failing to see the warning signs that made many of us Never Republicans.
As I read Linda Chavez here, she is somewhat optimistic about the prospect for Republicans moving on from a nationalist, populist, racist, lawless, authoritarian Trump cult of personality and reconstructing a normal conservative party. Like those in the more somber, pessimistic corner of Never Trumpism, I fear that's unlikely. We don't need "psychosis" as an explanation for why we shouldn't place our bets on that outcome. Just understanding what comes of activating all the fear and pleasure centers Trump and his crew have activated should keep us up at night (note: as I write this, I'm up at night). For the record, like Yascha Mounk, I also identify as left-of center but am more willing to identify with the center than ever before. At this point, I view the evacuation of the center of US politics with alarm, fear the effects of the deliberate destruction of vital institutions, and would be thrilled to see the construction of a healthy conservative movement with which I could disagree without fear of anyone being drawn and quartered.