Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ralph J Hodosh's avatar

The media are addicted to using the terms "far right", "right", "center right", "middle", "center left", "left" and "far left" to describe a "political spectrum" that was, perhaps, the reality of the late 20th century, but no longer describes what is happening as we move further into the 21st century. If politics could ever be described in terms of a one-variable (right-left) spectrum, that is no longer the situation. We need a new understanding and with it a new vocabulary.

Expand full comment
Frallen's avatar

'And that concern is now especially pronounced among the continent’s young people, who are more accustomed than their elders to living in a genuinely diverse environment, but also more directly exposed to the problems that flow from a lack of integration.'

Diversity is only a strength if it is contained within certain shared values that provide some cohesion for the whole. Mindless diversity for the sake of diversity alone without providing for this is exactly the lack of integration mentioned above and here we are. People are fond of saying the US is a melting pot. Well, it was, but only because the immigrants who came here embraced values they found here and it allowed us to enjoy, reward and enfold these folks but also to maintain our integrity as a nation. And they have enriched our country beyond measure. But it is a fact that values held by some societies whose immigrants find their way to the West are fundamentally incompatible with Western values. And you can bet that at least some of those are bent on bringing down the very countries whose freedoms allow them to be there in the first place.

The assumption seems to be that populism = fascism. Mr Hodosh below hints at we need a new definition. How about one that has a wide latitude of tolerance and hospitality for different peoples and cultures, but also knows who it is as a nation, has a healthy sense of self preservation and isn't afraid to draw the line when its integrity is threatened as a start. I would never go to another country and expect them to abandon their values and fundamentally change to become something they aren't for me or my tribe. Marriages where one person tries to fundamentally change the other beyond the usual give and take usually do not last long. So why should it be different for nations?

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts