Discussion about this post

User's avatar
A F's avatar

This seems to be driven by commercial interest as much as anything.

It is not surprising that many of the people pushing this are contemporary authors, particularly YA authors, the very YA authors whose books would have the chance to bought en masse by school systems. There is a lot of money to be made in the selection of which books get read by schoolchildren.

Cluess wasn't just canceled for pure and noble social justice reasons; she was canceled because she was threatening the latest sales strategy in a struggling industry in which she is a competitor.

I think in general "cancellations" are so brutal in fields like fiction writing and academia because these fields are so competitive and there is a massive glut of particularly mediocre aspirants. "Social Justice" and "identity" have become a powerful tool to build a brand, develop a following, and knock off rivals, and to do so with the patina of moral superiority. We should not be surprised when people flagrantly exploit it. (And it should not surprise us that those who lack inherent "Identity" currency will try to create some for themselves; I think a lot of the growth in straight middle class white girls declaring themselves "non-binary", vaguely "queer," and #ActuallyAutistic is because they feel pressure to create for themselves the foundation for an #OwnVoices or Diversity platform, or as a post hoc defense of one after being "called out".)

Diversification of literature is good. We have an extraordinary body of excellent, complex, and worthy literature written by writers of color and writers from cultures or experiences that are not well represented in "The Canon" to integrate into education programs. Doing so would strengthen both education and "The Canon."

But this movement is not that.

Expand full comment
Charles Littrell's avatar

Regarding the W.E.B. DuBois quote and Dumas, readers may be interested to know, if you didn't already, that Dumas Pere's grandmother was an African slave by way of the Caribbean. His father was a "raised man" in Napoleon's army, eventually rising to general.

Regarding the article, we are seeing the same thing in live theatre. The movement in many quarters for 50/50 gender representation among playwrights means that male playwrights compete with Shakespeare, Chekhov, and all the rest, while female playwrights usually compete with...each other. So half our performed plays come from only one generation of authors.

Expand full comment
36 more comments...

No posts