Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sam Taylor's avatar

Hi Yascha,

Thank you for the work in creating Persuasion. I have put a question about the project in this comment, and would love to see an FAQ where questions could be posted.

I signed up for Persuasion for two reasons. The first is I ideologically agree with your thesis and ideology. I like to read ideas that agree with my model of the world.

The second is more worrying. I felt I had to support the project because other similarly "liberal" publications have become first and foremost about winning the culture war. In that goal, they seem to be slowly throwing away their limiting principles, and doing and saying whatever they can to win.

You are someone who I have seen trying to thread this needle. Both holding the liberal position without throwing away values I see as fundamental to the position. I believe in you, and that has been enough of a reason for me to give my own money.

But what are your plans to allow Persuasion to maintain this position? What processes and incentives will you put in place to prevent the organization from being pulled towards "winning the culture war"? This answer may be as simple as "hire the right people", but I worry this may not be enough.

One example of a process could be asking people to sign up for longer subscription cycles. This allows people to not be able to immediately cancel when they get an emotional rush. Another could be having explicit counter argument essays, forcing people to confront the strongest positions against the liberal position (and there are many).

Thank you for your work,

Sam Taylor

Expand full comment
DavidWR's avatar

>>> all individuals get to pursue a meaningful life irrespective of who they are.

With respect, politely, and hopefully persuasively, I will suggest that this is a grossly inadequate core value. It is actually just a statement of fact. All individuals, even those imprisoned in poverty, or actually in prison, are free to pursue a meaningful life. And society has no obligation to make outcomes equal - to make everyone a millionaire. But one of the most critical problems in our society is that a huge fraction of our populace does not have a reasonable prospect of success in pursuing a meaningful, happy, fulfilled life because of conditions outside their control - the relative wealth of their parents, their race, their ethnicity, their gender or orientation, etc. I have joined because I think I understand where you are trying to go, and I am willing to support well-intentioned efforts even if I am not in agreement with every detail. But if you want to keep me long-term, I'll have to be convinced that the group's core values include crafting a society where all individuals are not just "free to pursue" but have a reasonable opportunity to actually *achieve* a life of meaning, happiness and reasonable material success. Historically (and you do a good job of making this point) liberal society has extolled the values of freedom, free thought, intellectual debate while turning a blind eye to inequalities of opportunity. One of the great challenges of our age is how to continue to promote these liberal values, but to refuse to accept that the price of these values is a society without equal opportunity. "Free speech" is a wonderful value to have when your stomach is full, when your child can go to college, when your dad can get the surgery he needs. If your children do not have the opportunity to live a meaningful life, cannot get into or afford good higher education, and are systematically oppressed, "free speech" is really pretty worthless. To be clear, I believe in a fairly absolutist version of free speech. But it't not enough for a society to guarantee everyone free speech if we can't also guarantee they have a chance of achieving whatever they consider the good life to be.

Expand full comment
63 more comments...

No posts